AhlulBayt Islamic Mission

inna lillah i wa inna ilaih i raji'oon
this is the need of all illegitimate rulers coz unless they justify the legitimacy of Yazid's rule they cannot justify their own

oh my god, how can this stupid man say that praise shud be given to this evil yazid, who was a sick twisted alcohoilic. he massacred tortutred the family the children of our and all muslims beloved prophet. i agree totally these new evil rulers who do not want islam wnat to be like yazid and thats why they are saying this. even a child can say that the evil that this monster yazid who allah has cursed did to the children of our beloved prophet was so bad so so bad that yazid is not praisworthy but hate worthy. yazid was the devil

May Allah (SWT) raise him and yazid bn mu'awuya (LA) on the day of reckoning together for the support he is given or showing to this beast (yazid). And May Allah (SWT) raise us together with our beloved Ahlul Bayt (AS).

I AM NOT SURPRISED. BECAUSEi T IS A PROMINENT QAULE MASOOM THAT A PERSON IS HIDDEN UNDER HIS TOUNGE.IN FACT HE IS ANNOUNCING HIS NASAB.IT IS HIS MOTHERS SIN.

O Muhammad (pbuh) Look at what state your ummah has fallen to, They have left your words, they have back bited your Ahlulbayt. They have tortured your Ahlulbayt. They have killed your grandsons in karbala, dungeons and etc.. And since ASIRS (years) they have tried forcing us to like beasts such as Muawiya (L.A) and his evil son Yazid (L.A).
They have burned and hidden all the true books, history and so on. and rebuilt their own ones. There new religion is money not islam.. May you keep as attached to your deen and Ahlulbayt, also your true sunnah. Ameen

What has the world come to?! truly shocking and deeply disgusting!

By there faith he is right !!! because as per quran on the day of judgement people are come up bhind there Imams so let them yazeed(L.A) his Imam.
And we come ups with our 14th Masoomeen and 12 Imams.

Let us all unite as "Ummat-e-Rasool". These words were said by a Shia Imam leading a Jummah in a Sunni Masjid, in US. He was invited by the community elders. The past cannot be changed, but the present determines the future.
May Allah bless you all.

Esto no es Islam, esto deshonrra a nuestros heramanos sunna, los wahabitas estan fuera de la FE y desandan el camino de SAIEDNA MOHAMMAD (SAWS) y de quienes le precedieron, lamentablemente esas mentes son hoy los que gobiernan el territorio político de la Meccah, porque el territorio sagrado sera siempre del Profeta MOHAMMAD (SAWS) y de AHLU EL BAIT, la Maldicion de ALLAH caiga sobre aquellos que desobedecen sus mandatos.

but i think before passing any comment we should must consult the sayings of the prophet (S.A.W). as a matter of fact amir muawiya was the katib-e-wahi. so there is possibility of being detraped. as for as the matter of yazid and Imam Hussain is concerned. i thinkk that we have loaded things on it and shaped it just to tell the story like. according to a hadith of Bukhari the happy news of jannah is for a person who took part in a holly war. and trhat war was led by yazid. we say all this b coz we have no habit to study. so we should think before passing any comment.

qaisar maan, here's wishing you a speedy journey to the abode of your imams muawiya, yazeed, abdullah ibne umar, sahih bukhari, and i might as well add shimr, ibne ziad, khalifas of the clans bani umayya and bani abbas and infant killer hurmala (according to your logic he too participated in the 'holy war' ) not to mention zakir naik, israr ahmed, benjamin netanyahu, george w bush, saudi khalifas etc. Good for you! You seem to be of the same creed as that of the above shaitaans and their and your ancestor iblees. And to my logic your heaven must be the burning fire hell where you would be most blissful because thats where you all come from and that's where you belong.
As for us we hope to go to the jannah of our leaders our Imams the Ahlul Bait. Vastly different from your jannah. Wouldn't you say.
Bon Voyage!

Qisar Maan ibne Iblees
Read your comment again. You talk of 'study'. Is it a joke? you seem ignorant and illiterate. Go educate yourselg maan. after you learn the basics you might be able to understand what I've written.

yazid is shaitaan and la'anati.....he is responsible for the incidence of karbala

The beloved Muslims of Prophet & His Ahlulbait should not be worried about these types of irrational and non- acceptable remarks, beliefs and having affections towards the killers or the destroyers of the true comandments of Allah & His Prophet's blood(Ahlulbait). This shows that how ignorance has penetrated within selves who have left Ahlulbait as their forefathers did.

" History and blood both speaks about their origions"

The true lovers of Prophet and Ahlulbait need to discourage all these ill - natured remarks through unity among the Muslims.

the one who is following Yazid LA is actually from Yazidi family of the history and yazidi family is the family of yazid LA

Cure be on all those who have hatred for Ahlebaith!!!

Only thing i know to say about
YAZEED BIN Muaweya ( Lanay Allah Aleh ) 1,000,000 Times
Keep giving Lanat On Yazeed , Maweyaa
and never say Ameer Al Momineen to anyone except
MOLA IMAM ALI ( a.s ) ...

OYE YAZEED KO JUTEYA PERNI HEIN aur uske peyo ko bhi
SUB LANTI HEIn JO BHI AHLE BAIT (as) k Dushman hein
Dushman e Ahle Bait pe lant BayShumaaaaaaar

Dear Qaisar Maan

It is not Yazid who participated in the first naval force but it was his father Muáwiya (Radhiallaahu Anhu) during the Caliphate of Usman (Radhiallaahu Anhu).
In fact it is reported in Bukhari Shareef that Rasool Allah (S.A.W) said: 'The first army that will fight a naval battle in my Ummah will have made Jannat compulsory on themselves.' The first naval force was in fact headed by Muáwiya (Radhiallaahu Anhu) during the Caliphate of Usman (Radhiallaahu Anhu).

It is not Yazid who participated in the first naval force but it was his father Muáwiya (Radhiallaahu Anhu) during the Caliphate of Usman (Radhiallaahu Anhu).

As early as 668 the Caliph Muawiyah I (Radhiallaahu Anhu) sent an army under his son Yazid against the Eastern Roman Empire. Yazid reached as far as Chalcedon and took the important Byzantine center Amorion. Although the city was quickly recovered, the Arabs next attacked Carthage and Sicily in 669. In 670 the Arabs captured Cyzicus and set up a base from which to launch further attacks into the heart of the Empire. Their fleet captured Smyrna and other coastal cities in 672. Finally, in 672, the Arabs sent a large fleet to attack Constantinople by sea. While Constantine was diverted by this, the Slavs unsuccessfully attacked Thessalonika.
Constantinople survived the Arab siege until 678, when the Byzantines employed Greek fire against the Arab fleet at the Battle of Syllaeum in Pamphylia. This was one of the first times Greek fire was used in combat. The Arabs withdrew, and were almost simultaneously defeated on land in Lycia in Anatolia.

SALAM ALAIKUM RAHMATULLAHI WA BARKATUHU

DEAR READERS

REGARDING YAZID WE ASK OURSELVES THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

1. YAZID CONSPIRED TO KILL HAZRAT IMAM HUSSAIN (Radhiallaahu Anhu) WHEN HAZRAT IMAM HUSSAIN (Radhiallaahu Anhu) WANTED TO PERFORM HAJ. DO WE RESPECT YAZID FOR THIS??

2. AS PER KALAM-E-PAK ( QURAN ) ALLAH SAID HE IS THE ENEMY OF THOSE WHO HURT FAMILY OF RASOOL ALLAH (S.A.W.). ALLAH ALSO SAID HE IS WITH THOSE WHO RESPECT RASOOL ALLAH (S.A.W) AND HIS FAMILY.
SHOULD WE RESPECT YAZID AND EARN ENIMITY WITH ALLAH?

3. YAZID CAUSED NOT TO GIVE AZAN IN MASJID NABVI FOR 3 DAYS, HIS ARMY TIED HORSES IN MASJID NABVI AND AT MAZAR-E-MUBARAK OF RASOOL ALLAH (S.A.W) HORSES DUNG AND URINE WAS PASSED IN MASJID NABVI AND AT MAZAR-E-MUBARAK. YAZID'S ARMY AT MADINA KILLED MORE THAN 10,000 SAHABA.
STILL SHOULD WE RESPECT YAZID?

4. YAZID SENT HIS ARMY FROM MADINA TO MECCA THERE THEY DAMAGED KABETULLAH SHERIEF BURNT THE CLOTH OF KABA. ATTACK ON MECCA IS FORBIDDEN BY ALLAH.

STILL SHOULD WE RESPECT YAZID???????????????????????????

Disgusting Shias...they curse everyone except the family of the Prophet. They consider Ali (RA), Hasan (RA), Husain (RA) as the so called "Imams" which according to their complicated and Sabaite definition means equivalent to "Prophet" Disgusting Shias cursed even by Ali (RA) and Hasan (RA). Disgusting Shias who betrayed Husain (RA) at Karbala and today make a great and false show of the Jaahil custom of Mourning...I wonder if they even think of anything other than Ahle Bait.

Mr, Ali Hyder, these are quite harsh remarks passed by u. I think putting blames on each other we should try to learn more about our history and the people who changed the shape of our history effecting till to date. The difference is very clear that u can only curse shias but never any of our Imams. Rember these are the decendants of your and my prophet. But on other hand we can critise your caliphs and kings becuase of their deeds and the role they played in damaging Islam .

Dushmanane Mohammad(saw) aur aale mohammad (as) par laanat beshumar qayamat tak...

to mr: aly hyder. the biggest hypocrite are you saudis.. i will not refer you as muslims... cuz from saudies you have different way of teaching in islam... WE shiaa dont say that your teaching are wrong and we dont say that our teaching is more right that yours...ahl el bait are more holy than yazed (naalat allah aleih) and dont forgett what the rasul said about imam ALI... so go and blow your self your saudi terrorist...

Yazid, laanatullah alaihi

Yazid one the greatest sinner in the era of Muhammad PBUH.

Although I've read most of the authentic books on Islam ,written by the prominent Sunnis and Shi'ite Scholars and also about the people who played main roles in its construction or destruction, what has emerged is a "NO WIN SITUATION" where the believers on both sides are reluctant to accept each other views on the most controversial issues. There're numerous traditions of Prophet of Islam quoted in Sunni books, if accepted by the Sunnis, they will condemn their claim that Mr Abibakar, Umar and Uthaman had any right on claphate. What's needed, at this juncture, is an impartial obserbation as to what the NON-ISLAMIC historian say about the issues.

The Succession to Muhammad is a book written by Wilfred Madelung released by the CambridgeUniversity Press in 1977. He writes in pages 309-310; " In the face of fake Umayyad claim to legitimate sovereignty in Islam as God's Vicegerents on earth, and in view of Umayyad treachery, arbitrary and divisive government, and vindictive retribution, they came to appreciate his ( Ali ) honesty, his unbending devotion to the reign of Islam, his deep personal loyalities, his equal treatment of all his supporters, and his generousity in forgiving his defeated enemies. " My personal opinion is that the list of Ali's enemies is endless, as it goes on and on. What I've concluded from a book "Nahjul Blagha" ( a compilation of Sermons / Letters and Sayings of Ali) that in the entire history of Islam TWO very distinguished names appear top of the list "Mua'via Ibn Abi Sufi'an and Ayesha daughter of Abibakar. Mua'via fought many wars against Ali even after the dimise of Muhammad, when Ali was forced by the believers of Islam to accept the office of caliphate and became their leader,against his will. And Ayesha left no stone unturned to oppose any move that Ali made. Finally when the limations of her hatred against the family of the prophet exploded and she fought a bloody battel known as " the battel of Camels). Irony is, that Ali was leading the believers of Islam (Umma). Her action thus logically, earned her a reputation in the history of Islam as " The Mother of Unbelievers".

Islam aaia tha k sab muslims mil jol ker rahein magar kiya hoa k eis ka batwara hogiya. Main Sunni houn magar aise kanjar aur bezameer logoun ko ab nahin manta jinhonein Islam mein gand phelaia aur duniya ki laluch mein her aik woh kaam ker gae jis ne oun ka thikana jhanum ban giya, Allah ki lanat ho oun sab per jo Rasool Allah aur ounki family k dushman ban gae. Jab bhi shia imamoun k bare mein sounta houn ya perhta houn k 12 mein se 11 ko shaheed kiya giya tu mujhe buhut dukh hota hai. Yeh kiya woh log nahin the jin k bare mein Aiat-e-Tahteer nazal hoi thi 33.33. Pata nahin musalman kioun nahin soochte k Rasool Allah salam ne kis ghar mein pervarish pai, kin logoun ne oun ko pala posa kioun k 7 bars ki umar mein woh yateem ho gae the. Kiya Abu Talib aur Fatima Binte Asad ( Ali ( karam Allah Wajoh k parents) ne ounko nahin pla tha? Kiya jab Ali (k.a.w) payda hoe to Rasool Allah (salam) ne ounko apni aulad ki tarah bara nahin kiya? kiya woh Ali ko jahan bhi jate saath le ker nahin jate the? Kiya apni akloti beti Fatima (r.a) ki shadi Ali se nahin ki? Kiya Ali (k.a.w) ne her her jang mein ounka saath nahin diya jab k hamare khulafa der ker bhag jaia kerte the? Kiya ham Muhawia jais koutoun ko apna khalifa mante hain jo haram ki aulad tha, jis ki maan apne zamane ki mashoor kanjri thi aur kisi ko pata nahin chala k ooska haqiqi baap kon tha? Wohi Muhawia jis ki dadi Hinda ne Hamza (k.a.w) ka kutcha kaleja oun k jisam se nikalva ker chaba dala tha? Aray lanat ho aise logoun per jo oosko aur ooske haram buche ( yazid) ko apna khalifa mante hain. Main Sunni houn magar ab oos Sunnat-e-Rasool per chalne ki kooshih ker rah houn jo Rasool ki family ne seekhai. Na k oun logoun ne jinko deen dharam se koi vasta nahin tha. Sirf duniya ki lalach samne thi. koi aisi sifat nahin thi k ounko sahi musalman kah ja sake. Bhaio aur Bhaino, choorh do aise logoun ka naam lena jo deen mein sirf gund phela ker vasil-e-jhanum ho gae. Abhi waqt hai, mot nahin aai, apna aqeeda sahi kerlo. werna roz-e-mehshar jhanum ki aag ban jao ge.

This article is very shallow and the author cunningly forgets to mention a number of crucial factors which is highlighted in the following page:

http://attalib.blogspot.com/2009/02/imam-husain-yazid-and-sunni-view.html

Also see: http://islam-qa.com/en/ref/14007/yazeed

Here is the live link:

http://attalib.blogspot.com/2009/02/imam-husain-yazid-and-sunni-view.html

Please read below the belife of Shia's and decide whether they are muslim or not. I am not witing on behalf of me or making it up, these are written in the shias books, you can find the references too.

Mullah Baqir Majlisi writes:

'When Imam Mahdi arrives, Aa'ishah will be resurrected so that she may be given a prescribed punishment and that Fatima be vindicated.' (Haqqul Yaqeen: 347)

The same author writes about Aa'ishah that "She was a traitor." (Tadhkiratul Aimmah: 66)

Again, Mullah Baqir Majilisi comments about Ayesha (R.A.) and Hafsa (R.A.) that: "They were both hypocrites." (Hayatul Quloob: 2:745)

Mulla Baqir slanders Ali, Fatima and the Prophet in such disgusting ways: It was narrated that [Imam] Ja`far Ibn Muhamad said : The prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h used to put his face between the breasts of [his daughter] Fatima before going to sleep" (Bihaar al-Anwar, vol. 43, p. 7

Again Mulla Baqir writes Ali Ibn Abi Talib said that he once slept with the prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h and his wife Ayesha in one bed, and under one cover, then the prophet woke up to pray, and left them together [Ali and Ayesha] in the same bed, under the same cover" (Bihaar al-Anwar vol. 40, p. 2)

Only a Satanic filth who believes in those narrations would compile them

Curse on those who betray hatred to Ali (as) and his progeny. Love Ali, and be accepted by the Prophet (SAW) and once accepted by him you are accepted by Allah (SWT)...However, hate Ali (as) and you will never get any where close to Janaah. Lanat on Whabis!!!!!

Mashsalla broother Abbas...curse on Wahabis!!! beyshumaar

lanat on those who claim yazid as a pure ruler and a person to be allegance...because bastard is a man who killed ahylbat ...and quran has narrated clearly tht the people who support a tyrant who kill the humanbeing would go to heell...so people who support yazid assurelly will go to hell as he is killer or ahlybat .......
SALAM YA HUSSAIN(A.S) U R REALLY GREAT .......AND LANAT ON THOSE WHO CLAIM U WRONG BEACUSE U R MASOOM U R 1 WHO PROVES VICTROY IN FACE OF INOCENCE ....

1.on the day of Judgement for Ummah of Rasoolullah Salallah ho aleh he wasalam Allah will not ask YAZID WAS RIGHT ac to historical evidences and books and groups neither our hereafter it have any concerned with that.

2.To categorize Yazid anywhere in your life and considering it as responsibility to call good as good and evil as evil however when concret evidences according to Best knowledge of Deen which you have on the basis of that and perfection you can do anything and you can implement anything But according to hisotorians you cannot reach to one point as 100% correct

3.The debate in Islam continues since years and years due to Hadith those historical books and reference originated as from Rasoolullah Salallah ho aleh he wasalm they also have SAHI/DAEEF righ wrong narrations and their application and translation and interpretation.

4.English language lexicon translations of the books and a person who knows the language and its knowledge to the Quran and Hadith and Fatawa of Sahaba, tabaeen and taba tabaieen has to be first primary preference and then religion on your own you can interprete In islam

5.Yazeed was the caliph and evidence of drinking wine or sex or allegations dont have any 100% concret word to word reference based information therefore it is very clear no establish evidence it have as 100% acceptable by muslims and non muslims on SECTIARNISM AND NON SECTERIANISM BASIS that He is a very Wrong person

6.Yazid is ruler a ruler allow to punish and treat person to firm his rule and to firm the Islamic state rules and Further more ALLAH WANT TO SHOW THE DIFFERENCE B/W THE PROPHETS AND SAHABA AND ERROR FREE AND NON ERROR FREE PERSONALITIES

7.Difference of Opinion when two different people have different views both can be correct in hadith of Rasoolullah Salallah ho aleh he wasalam when Rasoolullah ordered one group of sahaba to Pray by reaching at place where Rasoolullah ordered sahaba and in that Sahaba in mid found the time of Maghrib Prayer and some prayed in mid and some said we are ordered by Rasoolullah salallah aleh wasalam to perform prayers there so when after that they both groups ASKED RASOOLALLAH SALALLAH HO ALEH HE WASALAM then RASOOLULLAH SAW REPLIED BOTH HAVE DONE CORRECT.

8.In islam a Person have authority in Family State Court Juridiction he have of power and then RASOOLULLAH SALALLAH HO ALEH HE WASALAM SAID anyone who is wise and Truth ful He should expect only that if Allah will forgive him then it would be the Best thing for him and not to expect more

9.When you are judging anything right or wrong Ac to one group when Rasoolullah Salallah ho aleh he wasalam have no evidence to take a decision b/w two parties then Rasoolullah replied that "IF I WILL MAKE ANYTHING HALAAL THEN WITH MY DECISION IF THIS IS NOT RIGHT OF ANYONE THAT WILL NOT BE THE LAWFUL FOR THAT GROUP/PERSON" DUE TO I DECIDE ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCE.

So Yazeed Neither any establish evidence for order for murdering him is present and at that time he was caliph.

MAY GOD GUIDE US TO THE STRAIGHT PATH
AND ALLAH KNOWS THE BEST
DR IBNEMANSOOR
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Dr Ibnemansoor seems to have a problem ;either yazid the cursed is right or imam husein is right; they can't both be right.
If he thinks Allah will forgive yazid then I certainly do not want to be in the same Jannah as yazid muawyia and his cronies.
Ya Ali madad

before abusing each other.u think how prophet (pbuh)can make mistake to marry aisha (rah) and choosing his companion omar ,abu bakar and othman.if all of them would have hypocraits.whaat do u think allah would not have informed him agianst them.and u think what u shias think and know is far better than what our beleved prophet(pbuh) know.

Imam Hussein and His brother Al-Hassan are Sayyid Shaba Ahl-Al-Janna, both in Sunni and Shia Hadiths. Thus, killing him of ruling is the same as all oppressor are doing and did to maintain their rules.

If you aknowledge the contrary than you shall be with Saddam, Hitler and their alikes.

If you aknowledge that he is wrong than why you leave sayyid shabab al-janna for Yazid the oppressor.

To raouf: Than why did prophet Lut married a wife that Allah destroyed. And Allah bring the example of another bad wife in the same sourat of Quran in which He blame Aisha and Hasfa of divulging the Prophet secret.

To Ateeq: Plz read your Sahih I can bring Hadith that will whiten your hair. Imam Khomeini ordered the removal of hundreads of Hadidth from Bihar Al-Anwar. Because that they have been aded with time. Also, in the Shia world it is know that Al-Bihar is just a compilation, without analysis, of all hadiths and stories found by Mullah Bakir.

Plz, Ask Allah to show you the ritgh path and look for it. Inchallah He will guide you so you can be ressurected with the Prophet, Ali, Fatima, Al-Hassan and Al-Hussein AND NOT Abubaker, Umar, Uthman, Mu3ayiwa and Yazid...

yazeed per lanat baway bc mc sub yazeed hai

I read all the comments and wants to comment on all the yazeed(LA) supporters.

Razia Sayeda - Good Job, good comments.
Saira & Yaa Ali - This is not the way we shud comment to these kind of haramzadas there is no need to give a respect by sayin.. Mr... he is a pure kaminah insaan, his name by the name of Maula Ali must be kept by mistaken, kutte ke bache i cant call u by ur name also, yes hum ahlebait ke gham ko apna gham aur unki khushi ko apni khushi samajhte hain.. abhi bhi waqt hai ... cum on a right path ...maaf kar diye jaoge(you must be forgiven)
Cristopher Mcdonald - Please find some good sources, books from where you can find the truth, find the sources from them who where very close to our prophet(saws) and ahlulbai(as)Imam Hussain (as) has given a long life to the Islam by serving the life of himself and his companions, we shias are the real supporter of ahlulbait(as).
Ateeq - Oey kamine ki aulaad(son of rascle), tujhe pata hi nai tera mamu(you dont know ur uncle) must be putting his toung in between ur mother both the legs and sucked, phir uske sath sota hoga tabhi tu paida huwa hoga kamine(then after that must be sleeping wz ur mother then u must hv born), aur tera baap teri khala ke sath sota hoga,kamine sach ko jaantewe bhi jaan bujh ke jhut ka sath denewale haramzade, hum shia rasool ki duwa hain unki aal par marte dum tak ronyenge aur gham manayenge.I know that you know the truth and jus pretending, so have a good fun with my reply.
Dr.Ibnemansoor - who gave u a doctors degree, u have discribed the things in a prolongated manner and u r cofused or purposely wants to be confused we dont know, i will make it easier for you yazeed(LA) is a big basterd and bloody drunker and is the one who destroyes our ahlulbait(as), we shia curse on yazeed(LA) unlimited number of times.
Rouf - It seems that u are having a very rare knowledge of islam, Rasool(saws) can never do the mistakes and yes we know the truth coz we are finding the truth from the sources who were very close to the ahlulbait(as) all the times...cum on a right path you must be forgiven.

This is something good initiative that someone have taken to openly discuss.

Lanaat Allah ala al Saud and their predecessor yazid. Damn Wahabis are the cause of every evil in this world...

To all Muslims who favor Yazid,

A SIMPLE TEST ON WHICH SIDE ARE YOU OR WOULD LIKE TO BE?

Introduction of Yazid as it relates to Battle of Badr (historically the first battle between the enemies of Islam and Islam's followers) and drawing parellelism to Battle of Karbala.
From the side of enemies of Islam:
Adba - Yazid's grandmom's father
Shayba - Yazid's grandmom's uncle
Walid - Yazid's grandmom's brother

From the side of Islam (chosen by Prophet Mohammad PBUH):
Hamza - Husayn's father's Uncle
Ubaydah - Husayn's fathers' cousin
Ali - Husayn's father

Who's side you'd like to be is your choice but let it be that your fate be determined with the fate of who you chose. We, Shias, know where our choice lies and it lies with our beloved Prophet and his family. It is for you to decide where do you stand.

May God open your eyes!
- Kazim

Mr Ali Hyder, Your words betray the sanctity of your name. You have a completely distorted view of Shiat and rightfully so. Because the essence of Shiat is not so trivial so as to be grasped by any Tom, Dick and Harry. Your name saves you because no Shia would curse you with a name like that. However, we will pray that your fate be decided with the enemies of Ali and enemies of Ahlul Bayt.

- Kazim

Imam Hussainsws.’s Last Sermon



To Umayyad Army in Karbala



On the 10th of Moharram in 61 A.H., Imam Hussainsws2 admonished the army of Banu Umayyad in Karabala by giving an eloquent Sermon.



Holy Prophetsaww raised me up by feeding the Divine Prophecies. I am the son of Prophetsaww and my mother is ‘Batool’sws3. I have been created as infallible Imam. I have the privilege of being the son of Amir-ul-Momaneensws. I am the son of that who holds the key to the future events and sustenance of the whole universe. Hassan (Imamas) has brought me up to his customs. I am the Divine authority, recognise me prior to declaring war against me. Be aware! You will close all the doors of forgiveness by killing me. You are doing this for the attraction of your leader’s promised rewards, but if you ask me, I can bless you thousands’ time more than that. (I know) collecting filth is in your genes. You are unable to comprehend and (debate with doubts) that we regularly travel through the milky ways. (Be aware) Stars are nothing else but aftermath of footprints. North pole finds its direction from ussws. Oursws destination is in ‘Qabah Quosaan’4; and ‘Bait-ul-Mamoor’5 is our residence. ‘Bismilla6’ refers to our beginning and ‘Yakhamah7’ concludes with our (attributes). ‘Innamah8’ describes our Divinity and Purity, ‘Allif-lam9’ is on our introduction, ‘WalAsr10’ is about our glandular status, The Verse of ‘Feel11’ is the narration of our past, ‘Walfaj12’ has borrowed colours from us, ‘Filqurbah13’ is the means to seek nearness to us, the verse of ‘Dahr14’ is on our generosity, ‘MinYashra’ defines our rights, ‘Al-Taha’ is about our way of life, the Verse of ‘Muzimmil15’ is our outfit, the verse of ‘AlQadr16’ authenticate our (Divine) rights, it is in our jurisdiction to change the direction of ‘Qabateen’ 17 we attend to the needs of others in ‘Rukku18 of prayers. Our traditions became the principles of religion; we are the ‘Ibrahimy19’. However, those who could not gain guidance from 63 years of preaching will not be influenced by my words. You are blinded by the ‘worthless’ rewards and are inclined to disgrace Holy Prophet’s familysws-which would result in your eternal punishment.