|
IHRC: Criticism of Archbishop Indicative of Levels of Anti-Muslim Sentiment |
|
|
|
|
Written by Islamic Human Rights Commission
|
|
Monday, 11 February 2008 |
Press Release: UK - Shock at Backlash Against Archbishop of Canterbury
Criticism of Rowan Williams Indicative of Levels of Anti-Muslim Sentiment
IHRC is shocked at the level and nature of criticism of Dr. Rowan Williams
remarks regarding the accommodation of some forms of Islamic law into British
law.
Whilst Dr. Williams remarks made clear he was speaking about some aspects of
personal law, media coverage and public and political discussion has raised the
spectre of hudood (i.e. capital) punishments, in a nonsensical manner. Further
the claims by commentators that these comments undermine the idea of one law for
all suggest either a lack of knowledge of the British legal system as it is, or
a deliberate misrepresentation of it. The Synod itself is a form of religious
court with its own jurisdiction. Beth Din courts for the Jewish community have
existed for hundred of years.
IHRC notes that many Muslims – notably Muslim women - already refer to Sharia
councils in Britain, as the Jewish community does with Beth Din courts, for
issues of marriage, divorce and inheritance. According to IHRC’s research,
enshrining these rulings in the law would give Muslims a greater sense of legal
status as citizens of Britain.
Head of Research and co-author of ‘Law and British Muslims: Domination of the
Majority or Process of Balance’[1], Arzu Merali said:
"Muslims are talking about incorporating minor issues in family law. Yet all
the talk in the wake of Dr. Williams comments, raises pictures of people being
flogged and arms being amputated. I think it's a very shocking response to his
comments which focussed as much on revisiting the stereotypes and mythologies of
a secular society, including Islam and the Enlightenment.”
For more information, please contact IHRC on (+44) 20 8904 4222 or (+44) 7958 60
74 75 or email
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
Notes to Editors:
[1] ‘Law and British Muslims: Domination of the Majority or Process of Balance’
is report by Saied R. Ameli, Beena Faridi, Karin Lindahl and Arzu Merali for the
Islamic Human Rights Commission, 2006. ISBN 1-903718-32-5, £8 pp 101.
The fifth report in the British Muslim Expectations of Government series has
been commissioned to highlight how certain laws and the experience of Muslim
communities of these laws is discriminatory and Islamophobic, whereby some major
questions arise; can the legal system of any country be neutral as to religion,
race and even gender? If so, in the United Kingdom, are we almost there or is
this work in progress?
A summary is available at:
http://www.ihrc.org.uk/show.php?id=1865
The full report can be ordered at:
http://www.ihrc.org.uk/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23&products_id=47
For a soft copy in PDF please contact the IHRC office on
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
or (+44)
20 8904 4222.
----------------------------------------------------
The Islamic Human Rights Commission is an NGO in special consultative status
with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.
Islamic Human Rights Commission
PO Box 598
Wembley
HA9 7XH
United Kingdom
Telephone (+44) 20 8904 4222
Fax (+44) 20 8904 5183
Email:
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
Web: www.ihrc.org.uk
Comments posted are the sole opinion of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of AIM. |
