Shiite

Search

Advertisements

 

Who's Online

We have 40 guests online
Is Sadr City Becoming The Next Gaza? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rannie Amiri   
Saturday, 03 May 2008
“They have now completely surrounded Sadr City. The media is talking about Gaza, while we now have a second ‘Rafah Crossing’ in Sadr City. The hospitals are jammed with dead bodies...the occupation forces completely ban and open fire at any convoy trying to deliver humanitarian aid. People here suffer from shortage of food supplies. The occupation forces have burnt the city’s market.”

- Sadrist MP Dr. Maha al-Dori

“Do you want a third uprising?”

- Muqtada al-Sadr

The ripples of the March 25th Basra offensive-turned-fiasco initiated by Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki have been transformed into waves of bloodletting, crashing rhythmically northward onto Sadr City. According to one governmental official, more than 900 people were killed and 2600 wounded in the teeming slum of three million in April.

For the past month, Sadr City has been effectively sealed off from the rest of Baghdad as United States and Iraqi forces attempt to crush Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army. In an ostensible effort to quell the launch of rockets from the neighborhood into the Green Zone, recent days have seen an intensification in fighting and causalities.

The largely symbolic Green Zone attacks are the only latest excuse to go after al-Sadr and his militia. His popular appeal among downtrodden Iraqi Shi’ites threatens to unseat the joint dominance of Maliki’s Dawa party and Abdul Aziz al-Hakim’s Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council (both of which favor the continued presence of American troops) in upcoming October parliamentary elections. Al-Sadr has always been outspoken in his demand the occupation come to an end. It was no therefore coincidence that Vice President Cheney’s March visit to Iraq shortly preceded the attack on his loyalists in Basra.

It was likewise unsurprising to learn that mortar rounds were being fired from Sadr City into the Green Zone by Mahdi Army members. Despite al-Sadr’s March 30th declaration reaffirming his ceasefire order – now in its eighth month – they continue to be targeted. Of far greater importance though are the ramifications of disproportionate violence and collective punishment being levied on the residents of Sadr City.

In an area only half the size of Manhattan, bombs have been dropped from U.S. warplanes, Predator Hellfire missiles fired and Apache attack helicopters dispatched. Yet the heart of Sadr City remains unpenetrated and only its southern outskirts precariously held. The difficulties of street warfare and a recent sandstorm – considered divine intervention by some – have hampered efforts to make further gains. The U.S. is now in the process of erecting a two-mile concrete wall which will separate the southern quarter’s Thawra and Jamila districts from the rest of the city. Apparently, what cannot be defeated will be imprisoned.

As is custom in conflicts where civilians frequently pay the ultimate price, the U.S. has resorted to the classic Israeli defense of blaming the victims. A Associated Press photo showing two-year-old Ali Hussein being pulled from the rubble of his home after it was destroyed by U.S. missiles (he later died in the hospital) caused military spokesman Lt. Col. Steve Stover to comment, “The sole burden of responsibility lies on the shoulders of the militants who care nothing for the Iraqi people."

Lost in the coverage of this conflict has been the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Sadr City. On April 23rd, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) reported that the fighting has isolated civilians from food and water supplies and caused hospitals to run out of basic necessities such as dressings and anesthesia. They continue to transport 10,000 liters of drinking water daily to the area.

According to the ICRC, as a consequence of the destruction of al-Jamila market – one of the largest and instrumental in providing for the entire community’s needs – “People are now short of food, especially as prices of fresh vegetables have increased considerably.”

Gaza too is under siege. The Israeli strangulation of this tiny strip of land has brought both humanitarian and military catastrophe to its people. It currently suffers from a severe fuel shortage which is hampering the ability of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency to provide food and other essential aid to the majority of Gaza’s population. On April 28th in the town of Beit Hanoun, a mother and her four children ages one to six were massacred while they ate breakfast as a result of Israeli shelling. Prime Minister Olmert blamed Hamas for their deaths. It is only one story among hundreds.

Sadr City and Gaza are starting to look more and more alike and their inhabitants have much in common with one another. Both live in densely-populated, poverty-stricken areas where food, clean water, fuel and medical supplies get harder to come by as life under siege takes its inevitable toll; both are reeling from Israeli and American military strikes killing scores of civilians in their midst. Al-Sadr’s eight-month ceasefire is in jeopardy of being rescinded while Hamas’ offer for one was quickly rejected.

Of all the unmitigated disasters the occupation of Iraq has wrought and of all the comparisons made to other foreign misadventures, the U.S. siege of Sadr City and its unfortunate similarity to the Israeli siege of Gaza is certainly one of the most damning.

Rannie Amiri is an independent commentator on the Arab and Islamic worlds. He may be reached at rbamiri at yahoo.com.


Comments (10)
1. Written by HA on 05-05-2008 08:14
 
 
OUR ELECTED IRAQIGOVERNMENT TAKES THE BIGGEST BLAME, SHAME ON YOU AND US FOR ELECTING YOU
 
2. Written by Maryam on 08-05-2008 15:34
 
 
Thank you for the article. I feel I am unworthy to speak of the situation because of my lack of knowledge. No matter where I go to get information on what's going on I feel like I am not getting the true story. I only speak English so where do I go CNN? NO WAY!! However I have heard of stories and seen the pictures . I pray for the people of Sadr city. And yes shame on the Iraqi government. It is NO better than Saddam Hussien's regime. Still being puppeted by America and America's interests.The Al-Mehdi Army are true Iraqis that they are patriotic to their country. After all these years and centuries what has changed?? Look at the story of Imam Hussain (a.s) and you will find many similarities. I hope the Iraqi people will find strength and comfort in remembering his ultimate sacrifice and legacy.
 
3. Written by Dissapointed on 10-05-2008 01:00
 
 
I am extremely dissapointed that AIM would publish such Al-Jazeera type rhetoric that only aims at sowing division. What a simplistic superficial analysis that fails to consider the complexities. 
 
Iraq is rampant with criminal gangs who take law into their own hands, being judge, jury and executioners. Where intimidation is the tool of persuation. The Al-Mehdi Army is a current, a trend, which has been infiltrated by many renegades, whose methods are very similar to Saddam's. And who cocktail bombed Imam Husayn (a) shrine on 15 Sha'ban? Who is responsible for much of the sectarian killing? That is not to say that the entire organization is to blame or Muqtada is directly responsible. Hence, the Iraqi government's repeated emphasis that that they are not targeting him or his organization. 
 
We would hope that AIM would be more responsible than publish an article like this.
 
4. Written by Hadi on 10-05-2008 10:09
 
 
To the 'Disappointed' one: 
 
I am not from AIM, but it appears that you come from a background where happenings are categorized very monotonously. It's always either black or white. 
 
The writer of this piece, if you read it well, does not focus on the political dimension and the practises of the Jaysh Al-Mehdi.  
 
This is a piece that covers the humanitarian face of suffering that has currently overwhelmed Sadr City. It would do you a world of good if you could differentiate between a political message in favour of one group, and a humanitarian message.
 
5. Written by Maryam on 10-05-2008 16:20
 
 
The "criminal gangs" is the new Iraqi government and the terrorists who are being recruited into Iraq. And wherever did you hear that the Al - Mehdi army was responsible for the bombing of Imam Hussain's shrine. Just because the Al-Mehdi army is taking an anti-American/ anti-occupation stance does not make them the enemy. Who does want to occupied anyway?? And who are we to say that they cannot protect the civilians from such killings. So many innocent lives... I pray for peace for whole Iraq where they can truly be free and live together peacefully.
 
6. Written by Ali on 10-05-2008 22:32
 
 
I think we need to take the lead of our maraji' on this. They have the wisdom not to speak against Iraq's government.  
 
Why hasn't Ayatullah Seestani condemned the operation, and has made statements in support of Maliki's government? 
 
Why hasn't Ayatullah Khamenei spoken against Maliki's government? 
 
Also, here is a response of someone reknown for his critique of the American Administration, he even he does not speak against Maliki's government: 
 
Ayatullah Fadlallah to an interview question: 
http://english.bayynat.org.lb/news%5CInterviews_24042008.htm 
 
How do you see the campaign of Nouri al-Maliki's Iraqi government against the Sadrists and al-Mahdi Army? 
 
The issue is very complicated, considering Maliki's point of view and the people's annoyance by the chaos caused by the militias, not just [Moqtada] Sadr's militia. There are other militias as well, but al-Mahdi Army was put at the forefront, and this might have been an American plan. 
 
[The campaign] was proposed on the basis of imposing law and order and because the militias, not just al-Mahdi, were stealing oil, for example, and assaulting the people as if there was no government. We know that in any occupied territory, the occupier cannot give the government the freedom to allow it to move properly to prevent problems. America is creating commotion … and I think it has a big role in what happened.
 
7. Written by Jawad on 11-05-2008 00:10
 
 
Br Hadi, how can you claim that this article is merely highlighting a humanitarian issue? It is yet another cheap political shot at the Iraqi government and an attempt to distort the reality of the conflict in Iraq by fueling the sectarian discourse - something that so many Western and Arab journalists have done since 2003. To equate Sadr City with Gaza is absurd - it is cheap opportunism at best.  
 
Sr Maryam if you speak to the residents of Basra and their families, as I have done, they will testify to you the shear destruction that elements of Jaysh Al-Mehdi and other militias and criminal gangs have inflicted on the city and its people. Basra was rampant with murders, intimidation and oil smuggling prior to the security operations. Jaysh Al-Mehdi bears much of the responsibility for this - just ask their victims. Basra's residents were begging the government to intervene and take back control of the city.  
 
I too am shocked that AIM would publish such an article and I think it should be removed. It is an insult to the victims of these criminal gangs that have wreaked havoc and continue to destabilise Iraq. The only way to end the American occupation is for the Iraqis to impose law and order and take control of their country. Hollow anti-American rhetoric from Jaysh Al-Mehdi has done nothing but prolong the occupation.
 
8. Written by Son of Karbala on 11-05-2008 01:43
 
 
Br. Jawad, very well put. Unfortunately, Iraq has become a platform for opportunists, both in America as well as in the neighbourhood, to advance their interests at the expense of Iraqis.  
 
When the American media and the Arab media failed politically to depict the Iraqi government as sectarian (in light of recent developments), they try to attack it from a humanitarian angle. What is not mentioned is that before Sadr City was under seige it was under hostage. Much is said about the loss of innocent lives at the hands of the military, and very little about the greater loss at the hands of the militias.  
 
The same phenomena exists in Mosul under the hands of the Takfiri insurgents. The Arab governments and media knows that after Basra and Baghdad comes Mosul. The Iraqi Government has deflated any argument that it has a sectarian agenda. Also by not even consulting the Americans in its Basra operations, it also makes it sufficiently clear that they are planning and leading the offensive to restore security and order to Iraqi people. Finally, these operations, once complete, and once Iraq becomes actually governable, would then beg the question as to the need (or excuse) for an American military presence. 
 
Also further to Br. Jawad's illustration, similar to Basra, anyone who has been to Karbala recently, as I have, and speak to the people and the show owners are relieved that the Iraqi army came in and wrested control away from the gangs/militias. People feel secure and free in Karbala. There is greater freedom of affiliation, thought, and expression as a result. People can now focus on development. They can run their shops without being threatened. Reconstruction is slowly beginning. 
 
Like the Anbar Awakening, people of the South are also sick of the militias. Before they were seen as protection from sectarian killings. But now both Sunnis and Shias are realizing that these are simply thugs who use religion as a garb. 
 
Finally, it is a crying shame that Shias would assail the Iraqi government, accusing it of being a puppet regime. Is that why they have such warm political, economic, and cultural relations with Iran - America's arch nemesis? Is that why they have made it clear that Iraq will not become a staging ground to settle scores with Iran?  
 
I had the privelige of meeting Sayyid Sistani as part of a North American caravan. A question was asked as to how can we help Iraq. He said that we should be writing to the media in support of the Iraqi government which is being led by sincere people. 
 
So instead of joining in the chorus of everyone who wishes to suppress Iraq, in Western part of the world and in Iraq's neighbourhood, we should be doing our level best to support it. 
 
Iraq is going through a difficult time and a period of major transition, and appearances can often be misinterpreted. It is easy to be in the opposition critizing. It is much more difficult to actually govern, making difficult decisions, and choosing what is in the best long term interest of the Iraqi people. No government in the world is under so much pressure and has to deal with so many internal and external factors most of which it inherited, untangling a badly knotted up ball of yarn.
 
9. Written by Hadi on 11-05-2008 06:23
 
 
Your comments are all very welcome, although it does seem the author of the ensuing comments share their arguments, albeit with the slight twist of tongue here and there, and more importantly, similarly share in their aptitudes to comprehend the English language. 
 
Bearing this in mind, I'll take it upon myself to explicate things for "both" of you in simpler terms: 
 
- Is it untrue that there have been hundreds of civilian deaths in Sadr city? [900 according to one government official, as cited.] I should highlight that other sources put the figure much higher. 
 
- What do you make of the following: 
 
"International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) reported that the fighting has isolated civilians from food and water supplies and caused hospitals to run out of basic necessities such as dressings and anesthesia." 
 
Before we go into IDPs and a host of many other acute problems facing the residents of Sadr City, I put it forward to you, that as a moral and rational human being, what do you say in the face of this death and suffering?
 
10. Written by Hadi on 11-05-2008 06:27
 
 
To Sister Maryam: 
 
Apologies for bundling you with the others who came after me in the comment above.  
 
It appears the rationality that you put forth is beyond some minds. Thanks for the comment.
 

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
Name:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Comments posted are the sole opinion of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of AIM.

 
< Prev   Next >
Shiite